Changes from A6 to A6
| Original version: | A6 |
|---|---|
| Status: | Modified |
| Submitted: | 04/18/2026, 18:54 |
| New version: | A6 |
|---|---|
| Status: | Adopted |
| Submitted: | 04/18/2026, 19:00 |
Title
Motion text
From line 12 to 17:
● Concerned about European integration having largely stalled since the Lisbon Treaty in 2007 and further integration being made difficult by the requirement of unanimity;
● Concerned about European integration having largely stalled since the Lisbon Treaty in 2007 and further integration being made difficult by the requirement of unanimity;● Considering that differentiated integration (a “multi-speed Europe”) could
From line 22 to 27:
Maastricht treaty and Amsterdam treaty, which introduced the eurozone and enhanced cooperation respectively;
● Noting that unique country-specific opt-outs have often prolonged the differentiation, on the basis of which such exemptions should not be granted in the future.
● Noting that unique country-specific opt-outs have often prolonged the differentiation, on the basis of which such exemptions should not be granted in the future.
From line 38 to 39:
● Mindful of the limitations of existing tools for differentiated integration, such as enhanced cooperation. [1][Annex]
Delete from line 48 to 50:
1 Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, Title IV, Article 20, EUR-Lex, Publications Office of the European Union, EUR-Lex - 12016M020 - EN - EUR-Lex, 7 June 2016
Insert after line 84:
Annex
Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, Title IV, Article 20, EUR-Lex, Publications Office of the European Union, EUR-Lex - 12016M020 - EN - EUR-Lex, 7 June 2016